More Abortion Logic: “The fetus is a parasite.”

Tags

, , ,

Seems like just a few days ago I was commenting on logic of abortion rights that argues for infanticide.

This type thinking is so extreme that some pro-abortion advocates accused pro-lifers of writing it to make them look bad.

Now, a blogger at Daily Kos has presented a scientific comparison of a “fetus” (pro-abortion speak for baby) to a parasite. You just can’t make this stuff up. I won’t directly link the full article due to language, but you can read a description of it here and continue to the actual article if you choose.

This, my friends, is where the devaluation of life leads. Let’s develop an antibiotic to eliminate that pesky fetus parasite. Oh, wait. Already done that haven’t they?!?

HT: Shane

Pregnancy FAQ – All the important questions covered.

This is funny for two types of people. Those who have given birth and those who have been born. But especially the former.

via

Be All You Can Be: The Importance of Setting the Right Goal

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

photo via Chris Downer

Have you ever dreamed of being better than you are? You listened to that singer, you watched that athlete, you tasted that meal and you said, “I wish I could do that!” In your imagination you were as good as they were.

I’ve often imagined dunking a basketball. I’ve watched the talented players in college games jump to unbelievable heights and slam the ball in the goal. In my mind’s eye, I can see myself doing the same thing. Now, at my age and physical condition, not to mention height to weight ratio, that’s just not going to happen. But it doesn’t stop me from dreaming. Someone summed it up by saying, “We’re all great in our dreams.”

Just because we may not reach our wildest dreams, doesn’t mean that we can’t be more than we are. The fact is that many of us fail to achieve the potential that lies within us. For various reasons, we are unable to “Be all we can be.” This is especially true in our relationship with God.

Matthew 22:34-40
“But when the Pharisees had heard that he had put the Sadducees to silence, they were gathered together. Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”

Why are we here? Is there some reason for my existence? Some purpose for being on this planet? This is one of the great mysteries of life. Fortunately for us, the answer is found in the pages of the Bible.

It is God’s ultimate purpose for us to bring glory to Himself by being all that He intended us to be. Sin keeps us from this purpose. We are sinners by nature and by choice. In other words, we are born sinners, and we sin. It is sin that keeps us from fulfilling our potential.

How can we fulfill our God-given, God-glorifying potential? It begins with a goal. A goal enables us to focus on where we are going rather than where we are, or where we have been.

There are several benefits of a goal:
First, a goal will help maintain our sense of purpose. We know God’s purpose for us, but over time, we can lose our sense of it priority. Having a goal helps keep that purpose. Sadly, most people today wander through life with little or no direction.

Losing all purpose in life can be tragic. For some, it is even fatal. It may be a husband or wife who dies after the passing of a spouse of many years. Or a teenager who takes their own life, or a housewife at her wit’s end. Whatever the circumstances, it can often be traced back to the futility and hopelessness that come with a loss of purpose.

A goal will also provide us with motivation. It makes what you want to accomplish attainable. When you see that it is possible, it motivates you. A goal determines your direction. It shows you what to do. Have you ever felt like the Senator that was aboard a train? When the conductor came by, he was frantically searching for his ticket. He told the conductor, “I can’t seem to find my ticket.”

“That’s alright,” said the conductor said, “We know who you are. You don’t have to find it.”

“You don’t understand,” answered the embarrassed Senator, “I can’t remember where I’m getting of.”

Sometimes we feel the same way. On the train of life, headed somewhere fast, but not sure where we’re going.

Goals improve our focus. They allow us to focus on improvement rather than just activity. It’s easy to get caught up in the busyness of life, rather than the business of life. In order to focus on the truly important things in life, I have to be working toward the right goal.

Goals provide a way to measure our progress. They let us know if we are moving forward, and if we are still on track. There’s an old Charles Schulz cartoon where Charlie Brown is shooting a bow and arrow. He shoots an arrow that sticks in the fence, then goes over and draws a circle around it. That pretty much describes the approach of a lot of people. Just do whatever, and then pretend that’s what we were aiming for all along. That may help us claim success and feel good about ourselves, but a real goal helps insure we hit the target and make legitimate progress.

It’s clear we all need a goal, but what should that goal be? How high should we shoot? Maybe you are afraid to aim too high for fear of failure. James Russell Lowell said, “Not failure, but low aim is crime.” Low aim leads to little lives.

Low goals reflect self reliance instead of trust in God’s work and strength. The founder of the China Inland Mission, Hudson Taylor, said, “Many Christians estimate difficulties in the light of their own resources, and thus attempt little and often fail in the little they attempt.” When we rely only on our own strength, we will accomplish little. Thankfully we don’t have to only rely on ourselves. The Apostle Paul states, “I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me.”

In life, low aim may be a crime, but for a Christian, it is sin. “Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment.”

Jesus makes the Christian’s goal simple: “Love the Lord with all.” This is a high goal! In fact, it is the highest. The beauty of this God-given goal is that it will enable us to fulfill our God-given purpose. It is not more labor, but more love that God desires. Not greater works, but heartfelt worship. It’s not about religion, it’s about relationship.

You see, if you love God, you will labor. If we worship, we will work. That’s why God gives us one goal that will complete all His purpose for us.

Since we were created to love, we will only be fulfilled when we love the very one we were created to love. Thus, this one primary goal will effect God’s glory and our good. It will allow us to experience the “life more abundant.” When we love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength, we will be all we can be.

Why Stop at Birth? The Chilling Logic of Abortion Rights

Tags

, , , , , ,

Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva believe in the moral defensibility of infanticide. Of course they don’t call it that. The prefer “to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child.”

These two philosophers, writing in the Journal of Medical Ethics, present a chilling argument that:

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus’ health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.

While most people will find this appalling, it is simply the logical conclusion of progressive personhood (“the value of the unborn human increases throughout its development.”) taken to its logical conclusion.

As I have noted before, this creates a subjective criteria for determining personhood. At what point does a “potential person” become an “actual person,” and who gets to decide?
from flickr, by Marcel030NL
Hence, Giubilini and Minerva can attest,

if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn.

But who determines who is a “potential person” and an “actual person?” If these authors have their way, personhood is not achieved until some time after birth.

[I]n order for a harm to occur, it is necessary that someone is in the condition of experiencing that harm. If a potential person, like a fetus and a newborn, does not become an actual person, like you and us, then there is neither an actual nor a future person who can be harmed, which means that there is no harm at all. … In these cases, since non-persons have no moral rights to life, there are no reasons for banning after-birth abortions. … Indeed, however weak the interests of actual people can be, they will always trump the alleged interest of potential people to become actual ones, because this latter interest amounts to zero.

Who are these “non-persons?” Those with disease, birth defects or any child who would place undue stress or burden (emotional, financial etc.) on the mother.

Abortions at an early stage are the best option, for both psychological and physical reasons. However, if a disease has not been detected during the pregnancy, if something went wrong during the delivery, or if economical, social or psychological circumstances change such that taking care of the offspring becomes an unbearable burden on someone, then people should be given the chance of not being forced to do something they cannot afford.

Though I have known this is the ultimate logic of the pro-choice arguments, this is still one of the most disturbing journal articles I have ever read. Murder by any other name — infanticide, after-birth abortion, neonaticide — is still murder. Even pro-choice advocates recognize the disturbing “morality” argued for here.


The early church had to stand and speak against the practice of infanticide in the Roman Empire. As we gradually regress to a pagan society, Christians are being called to do so once again.

Nephos 9

Tags

, , , , , , ,

For your weekend reading enjoyment . . .

1. In honor of April 1st, here’s the story of the greatest April 1 prank, ever.

2. Last week I commented on Kathy Keller’s article on raising children in the city. Jonathan McBride presents a different perspective in Why Do Cities Just Make Sense.

3. One word comes to mind here: Ouch!

4. Running + Life Lessons = Winning Combination. I really connected with Running Lessons from Trails from the Heart.

5. A national Christian organization called for a boycott of an international coffee chain.

6. Russell Moore responded with an explanation of “Why Christians shouldn’t boycott Starbucks.”

7. Being of the “Don’t boycott OR buy” mentality, MereOrthodoxy’s Starbucks, Boycotts, and (Not) Buying Coffee resonated more with me.

*Whatever your view and/or approach to this matter, it’s not going away. The number of corporations who are pro-actively working against our positions on social issues is going to increase. We need to be prepared to have a well-thought out ethical and Scriptural response.

8. Two prominent professors have recently begun blogs – both have been added to my regular reading list:
Timothy Paul Jones and Daniel B. Wallace.

9. Perceptively accurate!

Weekends are for Worship: Worship and the Capability of God

Tags

, , , ,

“Now to Him that is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think, according to the power that works in us.”
Ephesians 3.20

Have you ever contemplated the magnitude of that promise? If it only said, “Him that is able to do all we ask,” it would be amazing.

But it says He is able to do all we ask or THINK! God can accomplish anything I can think up or ask.

Yet, it doesn’t stop there. Think what a great promise it would be if it said, “He is able to do ABOVE all we ask or think.” God can do things that are beyond my imagination or expectation.

And that still isn’t the limit: “He is able to do ABUNDANTLY above all we ask or think.” Not only can God exceed the limits of my mind, He goes way beyond.

What a great promise that would be. And it still doesn’t express the full capability of our Heavenly Father. There’s still one more adjective to add: “He is able to do EXCEEDING abundantly above all that we ask or think!”

Do you grasp the full capability of the power of our God? Exceeding. Abundantly. Above. All. Ask. Think.

God is not restricted to answering our requests. But, apart from His own will, there is nothing that restricts Him from fulfilling them.

Justice is Blind and Things Look Blurry to Me Too: What does justice for Trayvon Martin look like?

Tags

, , ,

Everyone is calling for justice in the Trayvon Martin case.

But what form does justice take? Almost everyone (on both sides) has formed an opinion of what exactly that justice looks like, despite the fact that at this point none of us know enough FACTS about the case to determine what would be just.

This rush to judgment reflects our prejudices, preconceptions, and presuppositions. Any different outcome will certainly be denounced as “injustice.” We’re so quick to support whatever affirms what we believe and denounce what is against it. Who cares about the facts?!?

All we know at this point is what we’ve been given by the media. The information may be accurate, and Zimmerman may be guilty as sin. It may be inaccurate, and he may be found innocent. Or, it may be somewhere in between. But ask yourself this question: Would I personally be willing to be judged and condemned on the amount of evidence I currently know of this case?

My answer? NO.

So while I want justice for the Trayvon Martin case, at this point I probably wouldn’t recognize it if I saw it.